Detailed Judging Criteria - Design Awards 2010

Award Scheme logoThe Borough Design Award Scheme 2010 will be judged on the criteria summarised below but will also take account of the Borough's planning policy guidance, including the Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Document.

The following criteria will be used across all categories, but a higher priority will be placed on certain areas for the specialised categories of sustainable design and historic environment.

Promoting innovative or creative design.

Is the scheme distinctive and visually striking?
Were innovative practices used in the construction and/or design?
Does the scheme utilise high quality and innovative architectural features and/ or a co-ordinated colour scheme?

Providing a greater range of facilities and easier access for everybody.

Does the scheme connect well to its surroundings?
Has the development added to the range of local facilities?
Does the development provide access for people with different types and levels of ability?

Enhancing the architectural heritage of the Royal Borough.

Image of a flats schemeDoes the design and layout of the scheme respect the established local context?
Is the design to a high standard that adds to the character and interest of the local environment?
Has the development adapted/allowed the retention of a building that is of significance to the local environment?
Has the development reflected local architectural styles and added to local distinctiveness?

Using good quality material and craftsmanship in a new building.

Are the types of materials appropriate to the local context in terms of colour, tone and texture?
Is the build quality and craftsmanship that has been used in the construction of the development to a high standard?
Does the development make innovative use of materials?

Adhering to the principles of good urban design.

Can you find your way in and out easily?
Are there places of interest to stop at?
Does the layout encourage anti-social behaviour?
Are there cul-de-sacs, narrow unlit alleys, hidden parking bays?
Is public and private space clearly defined: public fronts and private backs?
Has the development exploited its location effectively?

Image of a balconyEnhancing the environment through the use of public and private open space.

Does the scheme improve the character of the surrounding area?
Is it publicly accessible or visible?
Does it contribute to the enjoyment of the local area?
Does it respect the local environment, wildlife or habitat?

Incorporating sustainable design and construction measures.

Does the scheme embrace renewable energy technologies?
Are there measures to conserve water resources and/or the sustainable management of waste?
Is the scheme robust and durable, using sustainable materials?
Does the scheme support biodiversity?

For more information please see the Design Awards 2010 web page.

Back to top


How do you rate this information/service?
Help - What does this mean?
Find us on: 
RBWM on Facebook RBWM on Twitter RBWM on YouTube
Polish Punjabi Urdu
Modified: 2010-09-30
Published: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:25:26
Author: Charlie Fulcher
Editor: zzzPaul.Blissett
LGSL PID: 690
RDCMS ID: 28907